The life and times of a pituitary Cushing's survivor (1987) AND a kidney cancer (Renal Cell Carcinoma) survivor (2006). I must be a Super-Woman...NOT!
Saturday, June 29, 2013
From Bangladesh ~ Pituitary Adenoma: When headache is a headache
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a good and safe primary treatment option for Cushings disease, even in case of macroadenomas or invasive adenomas.
Abstract - European Journal of Endocrinology, 06/24/2013 Clinical Article
Saturday, November 3, 2012
A Quarter of a Century
I had my one, and only, pituitary surgery on this date in 1987. Of course, I was trying to get a diagnosis for several years before that.
I know it's hard to get a diagnosis now - imagine how hard it was over 30 years ago - before the Internet, Facebook, Twitter, message boards, chatrooms. No online support - no support anywhere.
Finding any information possible at the Public Library. Days that you feel like death warmed over, heading out to the library to Xerox medical articles you don't understand, poring over them at home, trying to find any kernel of hope for what you have. Then trying to convince doctors when your family doesn't even believe you.
Finally, a doctor believes you...but he's the wrong kind of doctor so he sends you away. Another year goes by. The endo recommends surgery but there are only 3 possibilities anywhere. NIH - close by and free, Montreal - they speak French - and San Francisco.
After a diagnosis, 6 weeks of inpatient testing at the NIH.
From my bio at http://www.cushings-help.com/maryos_story.htm
There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn't walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!
The MRI still showed nothing, so they did a Petrosal Sinus Sampling Test. That scared me more than the prospect of surgery. (This test carries the risk of stroke and uncontrollable bleeding from the incision points.) Catheters were fed from my groin area to my pituitary gland and dye was injected. I could watch the whole procedure on monitors. I could not move during this test or for several hours afterwards to prevent uncontrolable bleeding from a major artery. The test did show where the tumor probably was located. Also done were more sophisticated dexamethasone suppression tests where drugs were administered by IV and blood was drawn every hour (they put a heplock in my arm so they don't have to keep sticking me). I got to go home for a weekend and then went back for the surgery - the Transsphenoidal Resection. I fully expected to die during surgery (and didn't care if I did) so I signed my will and wrote last letters to those I wanted to say goodbye to. During the time I was home just before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn't know her) did die at NIH of a Cushing's-related problem. I'm so glad I didn't find out until a couple months later!
November 3, 1987, the surgeon, Dr. Ed Oldfield, cut the gum above my front teeth under my upper lip so there is no scar. He used tiny tools and microscopes. My tumor was removed successfully. In some cases (not mine) the surgeon uses a plug of fat from the abdomen to help seal the cut. Afterwards, I was in intensive care overnight and went to a neurology ward for a few days until I could walk without being dizzy. I had some major headaches for a day or two but they gave me drugs (morphine) for those. Also, I had cotton plugs in my nostrils. It was a big day when they came out. I had diabetes insipidus (DI) for a little while, but that went away by itself - thank goodness!
I had to use a foam product called "Toothies" to brush my teeth without hitting the incision. Before they let me go home, I had to learn to give myself an injection in my thigh. They sent me home with a supply of injectible cortisone in case my level ever fell too low (it didn't). I was weaned gradually off cortisone pills (scary). I now take no medications. I had to get a Medic Alert bracelet. I will always need to tell medical staff when I have any kind of procedure - the effects of my excess cortisone will remain forever.
I went back to the NIH for several follow-up visits of a week each where they did all the blood and urine testing again. After a few years NIH set me free. Now I go to my "outside" endocrinologist every year for the dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urine and regular blood testing.
As I get further away from my surgery, I have less and less chance that my tumor will grow back. I have never lost all the weight I gained and I still have the hair on my chin but most of my other symptoms are gone. I am still and always tired and need a nap most days. I do not, however, still need to take whole days off just to sleep.
I consider myself very lucky that I was treated before I got as bad as some of the others on my floor at NIH but think it is crazy that these symptoms are not taken seriously by doctors.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Medical management of Cushing's disease: what is the future?
Fleseriu M, Petersenn S.
Source
Departments of Medicine and Neurological Surgery, Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
Cushing's disease (CD) is caused by a corticotroph, adrenocorticotropic-hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenoma resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Transsphenoidal surgery is the initial treatment of choice in almost all cases.
Remission rates for microadenomas are good at 65-90 % (with an experienced neurosurgeon) but remission rates are much lower for macroadenomas. However, even after postoperative remission, recurrence rates are high and can be seen up to decades after an initial diagnosis. Repeat surgery or radiation can be useful in these cases, although both have clear limitations with respect to efficacy and/or side effects.
Hence, there is a clear unmet need for an effective medical treatment. Currently, most drugs act by inhibiting steroidogenesis in the adrenal glands. Most is known about the effects of ketoconazole and metyrapone. While effective, access to ketoconazole and metyrapone is limited in many countries, experience with long-term use is limited, and side effects can be significant. Recent studies have suggested a role for a pituitary-directed therapy with new multireceptor ligand somatostatin analogs (e.g., pasireotide, recently approved in Europe for treatment of CD), second-generation dopamine agonists, or a combination of both.
Mifepristone (a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist) is another promising drug, recently approved by the FDA for treatment of hyperglycemia associated with Cushing's syndrome. We review available medical treatments for CD with a focus on the two most recent compounds referenced above.
Our aim is to expand awareness of current research, and the possibilities afforded by available medical treatments for this mesmerizing, but often frightful disease.
PMID: 22674211 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Day Fourteen, Cushing's Awareness Challenge
And today, we talk about pink jeeps and ziplines...
How in the world did we get here in a Cushing's Challenge? I'm sliding these in because in Day Twelve I linked (possibly!) my growth hormone use as a cause of my cancer - and I took the GH due to Cushing's issues. Clear? LOL
I had found out that I had my kidney cancer on Friday, April 28, 2006 and my surgery on May 9, 2006. I was supposed to go on a Cushie Cruise to Bermuda on May 14, 2006. My surgeon said that there was no way I could go on that cruise and I could not postpone my surgery until after that cruise.
I got out of the hospital on the day that they left for the cruise and realized that I wouldn't have been much (ANY!) fun and I wouldn't have had any.
An especially amusing thread from that cruise is The Adventures of Penelopee Cruise. Someone had brought a UFC jug and decorated her and had her pose around the ship. The beginning text reads:
Penelopee had a lovely time on Explorer of the Seas which was a five day cruise to Bermuda. She needed something to cheer her up since her brother, Tom, went off the deep end, but that's another story!
Penelopee wanted to take in all of the sights and sounds of this lovely vessel. Every day she needed to do at least one special thing. Being a Cushie, she didn't have enough spoons to do too much every day.
On the first day, she went sunning on the Libido deck......she didn't last too long, only about 10 minutes. Goodness, look at her color! Do you think maybe her ACTH is too high?
Although I missed this trip, I was feeling well enough to go to Sedona, Arizona in August, 2006. I convinced everyone that I was well enough to go off-road in a pink jeep, DH wanted to report me to my surgeon but I survived without to much pain and posed for the header image.
In 2009, I figured I have “extra years” since I survived the cancer and I wanted to do something kinda scary, yet fun. So, somehow, I decided on ziplining. Tom wouldn’t go with me but Michael would so I set this up almost as soon as we booked a Caribbean cruise to replace the Cushie Cruise to Bermuda.
Each person had a harness around their legs with attached pulleys and carabiners. Women had them on their chests as well. In addition, we had leather construction gloves and hard hats.
We climbed to the top of the first platform and were given brief instructions and off we went. Because of the heavy gloves, I couldn’t get any pictures. I had thought that they would take some of us on the hardest line to sell to us later but they didn't. They also didn’t have cave pictures or T-Shirts. What a missed opportunity!
This was so cool, so much fun. I thought I might be afraid at first but I wasn’t. I just followed instructions and went.
Sometimes they told us to break. We did that with the right hand, which was always on the upper cable.
After the second line, I must have braked too soon because I stopped before I got to the platform. Michael was headed toward me. The guide on the end of the platform wanted me to do some hand over hand maneuver but I couldn’t figure out what he was saying so he came and got me by wrapping his legs around me and pulling me to the platform.
After that, no more problems with breaking!
The next platform was very high – over 70 feet in the air – and the climb up was difficult. It was very hot and the rocks were very uneven. I don’t know that I would have gotten to the next platform if Michael hadn’t cheered me on all the way.
We zipped down the next six lines up to 250-feet between platforms and 85-feet high in the trees, at canopy level. It seemed like it was all over too soon.
But, I did it! No fear, just fun.
Enough of adventures - fun ones like these, and scary ones like transsphenoidal surgery and radical nephrectomy!
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Day Eleven, Cushing's Awareness Challenge
In March of 1987, after the endo finally confirmed that I had Cushing's, I saw sent to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing's Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.
When I left this hospital after a week, we didn't know any more than we had before.
As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing's. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection.
My husband asked my endo if it were his wife, if he would recommend this surgery. The endo responded that he was divorcing his wife - he didn't care what happened to her. Oh, my!
I chose NIH - closest and free. After I was interviewed by the Doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial.
The night before I was admitted, I signed my will. I was sure I was going to die there. If not during testing, as a result of surgery.
The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.
There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn't walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Several were from Greece.
Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with - either a cure or dying. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!
During the time I was home the weekend before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn't know her) DID die at NIH of a Cushing's-related problem. I'm so glad I didn't find out until reading the alumnae magazine a couple months later! She was the same class, same major, same home-town, same disease...
We have a Scottish doctor named James Lind to thank for the clinical trial. He conducted the first ever clinical trial in 1747 and developed the theory that citrus fruits cured scurvy. Lind compared the effects of various different acidic substances, ranging from vinegar to cider, on groups of afflicted sailors, and found that the group who were given oranges and lemons had largely recovered from scurvy after 6 days.
I'd like to think that I advanced the knowledge of Cushing's at least a little bit by being a guinea pig in 1987-1989.
From the NIH: http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx
Hope through Research
Several components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conduct and support research on Cushing's syndrome and other disorders of the endocrine system, including the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Center for Research Resources.
NIH-supported scientists are conducting intensive research into the normal and abnormal function of the major endocrine glands and the many hormones of the endocrine system. Researchers continue to study the effects of excess cortisol, including its effect on brain structure and function. To refine the diagnostic process, studies are under way to assess the accuracy of existing screening tests and the effectiveness of new imaging techniques to evaluate patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome. Researchers are also investigating jugular vein sampling as a less invasive alternative to petrosal sinus sampling. Research into treatment options includes study of a new drug to treat the symptoms of Cushing's syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion.
Studies are under way to understand the causes of benign endocrine tumor formation, such as those that cause most cases of Cushing's syndrome. In a few pituitary adenomas, specific gene defects have been identified and may provide important clues to understanding tumor formation. Endocrine factors may also play a role. Increasing evidence suggests that tumor formation is a multistep process. Understanding the basis of Cushing's syndrome will yield new approaches to therapy.
The NIH supports research related to Cushing's syndrome at medical centers throughout the United States. Scientists are also treating patients with Cushing's syndrome at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD. Physicians who are interested in referring an adult patient may contact Lynnette Nieman, M.D., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3140, Bethesda, MD 20892-1109, or by phone at 301-496-8935. Physicians interested in referring a child or adolescent may contact Constantine Stratakis, M.D., D.Sc., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3330, Bethesda, MD 20892-1103, or by phone at 301-402-1998.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Remission of Cushing’s disease may improve body composition, reduce cardiovascular risk markers
Geer EB. J Clin Endocrin Metab.2012;doi:10.1210/jc.2011-3123.
Patients in remission of Cushing’s disease may experience decreased total fat and improved cardiovascular risk factors, according to data from a prospective study.
Researchers examined 14 participants (12 women, 2 men) with active Cushing’s disease before transsphenoidal surgery and 6 to 8 months after glucocorticoids (remission), using whole-body MRI to pinpoint patients’ lean and fat distributions. One patient required two transsphenoidal surgeries before entering remission.
Of the 14 participants, 13 had hypertension, which was confirmed by a resting blood pressure higher than 140/90 mm Hg or the use of antihypertensive medications. At follow-up, only three participants had persistent hypertension.
Most participants remained in the overweight (BMI >25 ) or obese (BMI >30) category.
Eliza B. Geer, MD, researcher for the division of endocrinology at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and colleagues, investigated the link between body composition and CV risk in the altered bodies of patients with Cushing’s disease.
According to the study, remission decreased visceral, pelvic bone marrow, subcutaneous (including trunk and limb) and total fat; waist circumference; and weight (P<.05). The researchers found that remission altered fat distribution, which resulted in decreased visceral/total fat (P=.04) and visceral fat/skeletal muscle ratios (P=.006). In addition, CV risk factors such as insulin resistance, leptin and total cholesterol decreased (P<.05).
“Prospective studies of CD [Cushing’s disease] are needed to understand possible associations between previous or persistent abnormalities in adipose tissue distribution and cardiovascular risk markers in patients successfully treated for CD [Cushing’s disease],” the researchers wrote.
Further studies are needed to examine the lack of change in adiponectin, C-reactive protein and other lipid measures.
Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.
Cushing’s disease alters fat distribution, muscle mass, adipokine profile and increases cardiovascular risk factors (serum insulin, glucose, leptin, high-molecular-weight adiponectin, C-reactive protein and lipid profile). Even though only a small group of 14 patients were studied, this is difficult to overcome in a rare disease like this.
They demonstrate that even though disease remission reduced most fat depots, dramatically improving body composition abnormalities, not all CV risk markers normalized completely; namely, adiponectin, C-reactive protein, and some lipid measures did not change after control of hypercortisolism. Furthermore, a decrease in skeletal muscle also persisted. This is interesting since one of the main complaints in patients “successfully” treated for Cushing’s disease is tiredness and fatigability, which persist beyond 1 year after surgery. This limits the patient’s exercise capacity and negatively affects their everyday life and subjective feeling of well-being, impairing their health-related quality of life.
Susan M. Webb, MD, PhD
Professor, Department of Medicine/Endocrinology
CIBER-ER, Unit 747 on Pituitary Diseases Hospital de Sant Pau
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
From http://www.endocrinetoday.com/view.aspx?rid=96175
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Day Three, Cushing's Awareness Challenge
On Becoming Empowered. Adapted from my blog post Participatory Medicine
This is kind of a "cheat" post since it's a compilation of other posts, web pages, message board posts and some original thoughts. I wrote it to submit to Robin's Grand Rounds, hosted on her blog.
For all of my early life, I was the good, compliant, patient. I took whatever pills the doctor prescribed, did whatever tests h/she (most always a he) wrote for. Believed that whatever he said was the absolute truth. He had been to med school. He knew what was wrong with me even though he didn't live in my body 24/7 and experience what I did.
I know a lot of people are still like this. Their doctor is like a god to them. He can do no wrong - even if they don't feel any better after treatment, even if they feel worse. "But the doctor said..."
Anyway, I digress.
All this changed for me in 1983.
At first I noticed I'd stopped having my periods and, of course, I thought I was pregnant. I went to my Gynecologist who had no explanation. Lots of women lose their periods for a variety of reasons so no one thought that this was really significant.
Then I got really tired, overly tired. I would take my son to a half hour Choir rehearsal and could not stay awake for the whole time. I would lie down in the back of the van, set an alarm and sleep for the 30 minutes.
A whole raft of other symptoms started appearing - I grew a beard (Hirsuitism), gained weight even though I was on Weight Watchers and working out at the gym nearly every day, lost my period, everything hurt, got what is called a "moon face" and a "buffalo hump" on the back of my neck. I also got stretch marks. I was very depressed but it's hard to say if that was because of the hormone imbalance or because I felt so bad and no one would listen to me.
I came across a little article in the Ladies Home Journal magazine which said "If you have these symptoms...ask your doctor about Cushing's". After that, I started reading everything I could on Cushing's and asking my doctors. Due to all my reading at the library and medical books I bought, I was sure I had Cushing's but no one would believe me. Doctors would say that Cushing's Disease is too rare, that I was making this up and that I couldn't have it.
I asked doctors for three years - PCP, gynecologist, neurologist, podiatrist - all said the now-famous refrain. It's too rare. You couldn't have Cushing's. I kept persisting in my reading, making copies of library texts even when I didn't understand them, keeping notes. I just knew that someone, somewhere would "discover" that I had Cushing's.
My husband was on the doctors' sides. He was sure it was all in my mind (as opposed to all in my head!) and he told me to just think "happy thoughts" and it would all go away.
A Neurologist gave me Xanax. Since he couldn't see my tumor with his Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machine there was "no possibility" that it existed. Boy was he wrong!
Later in 1986 I started bruising incredibly easily. I could touch my skin and get a bruise. On New Year's Day of 1987 I started bleeding under the skin. My husband made circles around the outside perimeter each hour with a marker, like the rings of a tree. When I went to my Internist the next day he was shocked at the size. He now thought I had a blood disorder so he sent me to a Hematologist/Oncologist.
Fortunately, the Hematologist/Oncologist ran a twenty-four hour urine test and really looked at me. Both he and his partner recognized that I had Cushing's. Of course, he was sure that he did the diagnosis. No matter that I had been pursuing this with other doctors for 3 years.
It was not yet determined if it was Cushing's Disease (Pituitary) or Syndrome (Adrenal). However, he couldn't help me any further so the Hematologist referred me to an Endocrinologist.
The Endocrinologist, of course, didn't trust the other tests I had had done so I was back to square one. He ran his own multitude of tests. He had to draw blood at certain times like 9 AM. and 5 PM. There was a dexamethasone suppression test where I took a pill at 10 p.m. and gave blood at 9 am the next day. I collected gallons of urine in BIG boxes (Fun in the fridge!). Those were from 6 a.m. to 6 a.m. to be delivered to his office by 9 a.m. same day. I was always worried that I'd be stopped in rush hour and the police would ask about what was in that big container. I think I did those for a week. He also did standard neurological tests and asked lots of questions.
When the endo confirmed that I had Cushing's in 1987 he sent me to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing's Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.
When I left this hospital after a week, we didn't know any more than we had before.
As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing's. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection. I chose NIH - closest and free. After I was interviewed by the Doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial. The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.
There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn't walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!
The MRI still showed nothing, so they did a Petrosal Sinus Sampling Test. That scared me more than the prospect of surgery. (This test carries the risk of stroke and uncontrollable bleeding from the incision points.) Catheters were fed from my groin area to my pituitary gland and dye was injected. I could watch the whole procedure on monitors. I could not move during this test or for several hours afterwards to prevent uncontrolable bleeding from a major artery. The test did show where the tumor probably was located. Also done were more sophisticated dexamethasone suppression tests where drugs were administered by IV and blood was drawn every hour (they put a heplock in my arm so they don't have to keep sticking me). I got to go home for a weekend and then went back for the surgery - the Transsphenoidal Resection. I fully expected to die during surgery (and didn't care if I did) so I signed my will and wrote last letters to those I wanted to say goodbye to. During the time I was home just before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn't know her) did die at NIH of a Cushing's-related problem. I'm so glad I didn't find out until a couple months later!
November 3, 1987, the surgeon, Dr. Ed Oldfield, cut the gum above my front teeth under my upper lip so there is no scar. He used tiny tools and microscopes. My tumor was removed successfully. In some cases (not mine) the surgeon uses a plug of fat from the abdomen to help seal the cut. Afterwards, I was in intensive care overnight and went to a neurology ward for a few days until I could walk without being dizzy. I had some major headaches for a day or two but they gave me drugs (morphine) for those. Also, I had cotton plugs in my nostrils. It was a big day when they came out. I had diabetes insipidus (DI) for a little while, but that went away by itself - thank goodness!
I had to use a foam product called "Toothies" to brush my teeth without hitting the incision. Before they let me go home, I had to learn to give myself an injection in my thigh. They sent me home with a supply of injectible cortisone in case my level ever fell too low (it didn't). I was weaned gradually off cortisone pills (scary). I now take no medications. I had to get a Medic Alert bracelet. I will always need to tell medical staff when I have any kind of procedure - the effects of my excess cortisone will remain forever.
I went back to the NIH for several follow-up visits of a week each where they did all the blood and urine testing again. After a few years NIH set me free. Now I go to my "outside" endocrinologist every year for the dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urine and regular blood testing.
As I get further away from my surgery, I have less and less chance that my tumor will grow back. I have never lost all the weight I gained and I still have the hair on my chin but most of my other symptoms are gone. I am still and always tired and need a nap most days. I do not, however, still need to take whole days off just to sleep.
I consider myself very lucky that I was treated before I got as bad as some of the others on my floor at NIH but think it is crazy that these symptoms are not taken seriously by doctors.
My story goes on and if you're interested some is on this blog and some is here:
Forbes Magazine | MaryO's bio | Cushing's and Cancer Blog | Guest Speakers | Interview Archive 1/3/08 | Cushing's Awareness Day Testimonial Archive |
Because of this experience in getting a Cushing's diagnosis - and later, a prescription for growth hormone - I was concerned that there were probably other people not being diagnosed with Cushing's. When I searched online for Cushing's, all the sites that came up were for dogs and horses with Cushing's. Not what I was looking for!
In July of 2000, I was talking with my dear friend Alice, who runs a wonderful menopause site, Power Surge, wondering why there weren't many support groups online (OR off!) for Cushing's. This thought percolated through my mind for a few hours and I realized that maybe this was my calling. Maybe I should be the one to start a network of support for other "Cushies" to help them empower themselves.
I wanted to educate others about the awful disease that took doctors years of my life to diagnose and treat - even after I gave them the information to diagnose me. I didn't want anyone else to suffer for years like I did. I wanted doctors to pay more attention to Cushing's disease.
The first website (http://www.cushings-help.com) went "live" July 21, 2000. It was just a single page of information. The message boards began September 30, 2000 with a simple message board which then led to a larger one, and a larger. Today, in 2010, we have over 7 thousand members. Some "rare disease"!
The message boards are now very active and we have weekly online text chats, weekly live interviews, local meetings, conferences, email newsletters, a clothing exchange, a Cushing's Awareness Day Forum, podcasts, phone support and much more. Because I wanted to spread the word to others not on "the boards" we have extended out to social networking sites - twitter groups, facebook groups, twines, friendfeeds, newsletters, websites, chat groups, multiply.com, and much, much more.
People are becoming more empowered and participating in their own diagnoses, testing and treatment. This have changed a lot since 1983!
When I had my Cushing's over 20 years ago, I never thought that I would meet another Cushing's patient in real life or online. Back then, I'd never even been aware that there was anything like an "online". I'm so glad that people struggling with Cushing's today don't have to suffer anymore thinking that they're the only one who deals with this.
Because of my work on the websites - and, believe me it is a ton of work! - I have had the honor of meeting over a hundred other Cushies personally at local meetings, conferences, at NIH (the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD where I had my final diagnosis and surgery). It occurred to me once that this is probably more than most endocrinologists will ever see in their entire career. I've also talked to countless others on the phone. Amazing for a "rare" disease!
I don't know what pushed me in 1983, how I got the confidence and self-empowerment to challenge these doctors and their non-diagnoses over the years. I'm glad that I didn't suffer any longer than I did and I'm glad that I have a role in helping others to find the medical help that they need.
What do *YOU* think? How are you becoming empowered?
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy by midline incision: A reliable method for treatment of hypercortisolism
Sayyed Abbas Tabatabaee, Sayyed Mozaffar Hashemi, Mohamadreza Fazel Najafabadi, Amirhossein Davarpanah Jazi
Abstract
- Cushing syndrome is one of the diseases associated with adrenals secreting too much cortisol. The syndrome was first described by Harvey Cushing in 1932.1 It can be caused either by a tumor originating from the corticotroph cells located in pituitary glands, called corticotroph adenoma, or primary adrenal hyperplasia. It can be also the consequence of some other rare conditions such as ectopic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) causing increased adrenocorticotropic (ACTH) secretion and macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (a primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease).2,3 To manage the situation, previous articles demonstrated some strategies including two main groups of surgical treatments and non-surgical procedures.Surgical interventions are very important to completely cure this condition. Pituitary surgery, referred to as transsphenoidal operation, is the treatment of choice for patients with secondary disease.2 However, in some situations, e.g. in patients with recurrent or persistent Cushing syndrome and those not responding to medical therapies after the surgery, the effectiveness of pituitary surgery is under question. Such patients are the best candidates for bilateral adrenalectomy. Some previous articles outlined this method.4 Laparoscopy is one of the methods recently used for adrenalectomy. During the surgery, some complications may occur which deteriorates patient's condition with noticeable rates of 9.5 to 12%. These complications are bleeding, organ damages, pain and deep vein thrombosis.7,8
Although in recent years the experts have achieved great improvements in management and treatment of the patients suffering from Cushing syndrome, some controversies still exist. In this manuscript, we explained a new method to accomplish a reliable bilateral adrenalectomy to manage the disease and cure the condition completely.After opening the abdomen, left adrenal gland is determined and adjacent vessels are ligated. Then, the enlarged adrenal gland would be entirely removed. However, adrenalectomy at the right side is not as simple as the left side. Renal vein detachment from the inferior vena cava can be a serious complication of right adrenalectomy if it is performed without enough exposure and experience. Massive bleeding in such clinical setting may significantly compromise patient's outcome. To avoid this complication during the procedure we can perform a new method explained below.
Access to the right gland cannot be obtained by conventional retraction of the liver and it is necessary to mobilize the right hepatic lobe by fully incising the falciform ligament, the right triangular ligament, and rotating the right lobe medially. In this procedure, the bare area of the liver is dissected from the diaphragm. Care must be taken to avoid twisting and occluding the vena cava during this maneuver. After medial rotation of the liver in the proper position, the right adrenal and inferior vena cava can be directly visualized. This excellent exposure makes adrenalectomy very simple and minimizes the risk for renal vein detachment as a significant complication.This method was conducted on 6 cases admitted due to Cushing syndrome in Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. While no major complications were observed, favorable outcomes were found in the 6-month follow-up period.Based on our experience, bilateral adrenalectomy via a midline incision is a promising and acceptable technique for patients with Cushing syndrome. However, due to excess adipose tissue and lack of enough exposure, adrenalectomy by lumbotomy in such patients has prominent limitations. Therefore, midline incision provides feasible exposure for direct visualization of both adrenals.
Full Text: PDF This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Investigational drugs may expand medical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome
Endocrinologists face many challenges when treating patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Diagnosis can be difficult because many of the disease’s characteristics, such as obesity, depression and hypertension, are also common in the general population.
Treating the disease presents hurdles as well. With its potential for total cure, transsphenoidal surgery remains the first-line treatment. However, the problems of achieving permanent remission in all cases demonstrate the need for medical therapies for this condition.
Currently, endocrinologists use several medical therapies to treat hypercortisolism, although none have FDA approval for that particular indication. Two new investigational drugs — mifepristone (Korlym, Corcept Therapeutics) and pasireotide (SOM230, Novartis) — have the potential to meet those unmet needs, according to experts interviewed by Endocrine Today.
“Recently completed research studies, which involved innovative medical therapeutic strategies that target the corticotroph adenoma itself or block the effects of cortisol in the periphery, should bring new treatment options in the future,” Maria Fleseriu, MD, associate professor, director of the Northwest Pituitary Center at Oregon Health & Science University, said in an interview.
Manufacturers of both new medications have submitted new drug applications to the FDA. Corcept expects to hear from the FDA on Feb. 17, according to a spokesperson for the company.
Mifepristone has a unique mode of action in that it blocks the cortisol receptor, Robert L. Roe, MD, president of Corcept Therapeutics, said in an interview.
“With that receptor blocked, many of the problems associated with Cushing’s syndrome can be greatly improved, including: obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, high blood pressure, quality of life and depression,” Roe said.
The SEISMIC trial, a 24-week, multicenter, open-label study, included 50 patients with persistent or recurring Cushing’s disease, metastatic adrenal cortical carcinoma or ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) syndrome that was not amenable to surgery, according to Fleseriu, who was an investigator on the study. There were two primary endpoints: blood sugar improvement in patients with glucose intolerance and an improvement in BP in patients with a diagnosis of hypertension but without abnormal blood sugar levels. The key secondary endpoint looked for global clinical improvement as determined by a three-member independent data review board.
Results from the phase 3 study showed that, overall, mifepristone yielded significant clinical and metabolic improvement in patients with refractory Cushing’s syndrome, Fleseriu said. Of the glucose-intolerant patients, 60% responded, and BP improved in 38% of patients. The global clinical endpoint was positive in 87% of patients, Roe said.
|
|
“In addition, out of 34 patients who completed the main study, 30 elected to continue in the long-term extension study,” Fleseriu said.
She said mifepristone “offers a new approach for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome that [has] failed other therapies. Keeping in mind that biochemical parameters will not be available for monitoring these patients, close clinical observation is recommended.”
Yet, there are aspects of mifepristone that are still unknown.
“There will be a learning curve with this drug on how to dose it and use it properly to get a good response,” said James Findling, MD, professor of medicine, Endocrinology Center and Clinics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, who was the principal investigator of the study.
|
|
Also on the horizon is the investigational agent pasireotide, a multiligand somatostatin analogue with a high affinity for the somatostatin receptor type 5, which is often expressed by corticotroph adenomas in Cushing’s disease. Pasireotide blocks the secretions from ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors.
“Pasireotide works by attacking the pituitary tumor to reduce the ACTH level,” according to Laurence Katznelson, MD, professor of medicine and neurosurgery at Stanford University and medical director of the pituitary program at Stanford Hospital and Clinics. “Possibly, this drug could prevent tumor growth or lead to tumor shrinkage, although we await data to support that.”
Results of the multicenter, phase 3 PASPORT-CUSHINGS trial, presented at the Endocrine Society’s 93rd Annual Meeting & Expo in June, included 162 patients with persistent/recurrent or newly diagnosed Cushing’s disease who were ineligible for surgery. Researchers randomly assigned participants to receive twice-daily subcutaneous pasireotide injections of 600 mcg or 900 mcg. The primary endpoint was urinary-free cortisol levels at 6 months without dose up-titration.
Of the patients in the 900-mcg dose group, 26.3% had normal urinary-free cortisol levels at 6 months; at 12 months, 25% maintained normal levels. The median reduction from baseline in urine-free cortisol after 6 months of treatment was 47.9% for both dose groups.
The researchers noted significant clinical benefit in most patients, including lower BP and total cholesterol, as well as weight loss, Fleseriu said.
“It is noteworthy that while urinary-free cortisol normalization was seen in just a subset of patients, the rate of normalization was higher in patients with lower baseline urinary-free cortisol, making it, in my opinion, an attractive treatment for patients with mild elevations in urinary-free cortisol,” Fleseriu, who was also an investigator for this trial, told Endocrine Today.
Pasireotide was well tolerated in the studies, she added.
“Adverse events were comparable to the other somatostatin analogues, with the exception of a much higher incidence of hyperglycemia,” Fleseriu said. “Patients treated with this drug will require strict monitoring and prompt treatment of hyperglycemia.” The reasons for hyperglycemia are related to inhibition of insulin release from the pancreas by this multiligand somatostatin analogue. The type 5 receptor is abundant on pancreatic insulin secreting cells of the pancreas.
Timely diagnosis, treatment critical
Cushing’s syndrome is the result of chronic exposure to high levels of cortisol. Cortisol, typically released in stressful situations, controls how the body uses carbohydrates, fats and proteins. In addition, it helps decrease the immune system’s response to inflammation.
Untreated, Cushing’s syndrome can have serious consequences, including significant mortality and morbidity. Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are critical for this rare disorder, according to Fleseriu, who is also associate professor of medicine/endocrinology and neurological surgery at Oregon Health & Science University.
The endocrinologist uses the following tests to diagnose the disorder: 24-hour urinary-free cortisol levels; late-night salivary cortisol measurements; and low-dose dexamethasone suppression test.
After making the diagnosis of hypercortisolism, the next step is to determine the cause of excess cortisol secretion. There are several tests available for this purpose: corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) simulation test; direct radiologic visualization of the pituitary and adrenal glands; and inferior petrosal sinus sampling for ACTH.
The most common cause is long-term synthetic steroid use to treat inflammatory illnesses such as asthma or rheumatoid arthritis, according to Katznelson. In these cases, gradually reduction of the glucocorticoid will reverse the disorder.
Another cause is an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma. The excess stimulates the adrenals to produce and secrete excess cortisol release, Katznelson said. This is also known as Cushing’s disease.
Pituitary adenomas are responsible for 70% of Cushing’s syndrome cases, according to information from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
Surgery is first-line treatment
|
|
First-line therapy for Cushing’s disease is transsphenoidal adenomectomy, in which the surgeon approaches the pituitary through the nose and, using either a microscope or endoscope by trained neurosurgeons, according to John Carmichael, MD, assistant professor of medicine, The Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.
The procedure boasts an excellent cure rate.
“In good hands, with a small tumor, you can get cure rates of about 85%,” Carmichael said. “It depends on a number of factors: the skill of the surgeon, the size of the tumor and the level of invasiveness.”
If surgery is curative, the patient will require cortisol replacement.
“Once you remove the tumor, the normal tissue has been suppressed by the activity of the tumor for so long that it takes a long time for patients to recover and start making cortisol on their own,” Carmichael said. “It can take as long as 6 to 12 months for patients to completely recover their normal cortisol secretion once they’ve been cured.”
|
|
However, the surgery is associated with risks, including bleeding and infection, although they are “pretty rare,” according to Carmichael. One of the most common risks is a pituitary injury that can cause diabetes insipidus, which is almost always transient. Other postoperative problems include possible cerebrospinal fluid leaks and the possibility of recurrence, said David M. Cook, MD, an endocrinologist in the department of medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University.
Sometimes the tumor is hard to find during the first surgery, Katznelson said.
“The problem is, in 40% to 50% of patients who have Cushing’s disease, the tumor is very small, if not almost invisible, on the MRI scan,” he said. As a result, the surgeon may remove normal gland or possibly the entire pituitary, resulting in hypopituitarism. The patient would require hormone replacement and would still have Cushing’s syndrome.
Radiation is a possible treatment for these cases.
“The role of radiation is in the patient who has already had surgery for Cushing’s syndrome. The tumor is visible but cannot be completely removed. Radiation is most useful when there is a target to irradiate,” Katznelson said, adding that even in these cases, radiation cannot promise 100% efficacy.
Unfortunately, radiation takes a significant amount of time to work.
“People are a little reluctant to use radiation because it takes years to help,” Cook said. “It is not curative and patients can relapse from radiation also; it is not foolproof.”
Ectopic ACTH syndrome
Sometimes, tumors located outside the pituitary can produce ACTH, resulting in the ectopic ACTH syndrome. The tumors are usually malignant. In more than half of the cases, the tumors are found in the lungs, according to information from the NIDDK.
“You would need surgery in that location to get rid of the tumor,” Carmichael said.
If an adrenal tumor is stimulating an overabundance of cortisol, the definitive cure is adrenalectomy.
“If we do adrenalectomy, all of the [symptoms of] Cushing’s syndrome go away, but the primary pituitary tumor, which may have been microscopic, can start to become more aggressive and grow and become more difficult to treat in the long run,” Katznelson said. “That is Nelson’s syndrome.”
The adrenal insufficiency that follows adrenalectomy is serious, Cook said.
“It is dangerous to not have your adrenals; it is the most dangerous disease that endocrinologists treat,” he said. “A number of sudden deaths have been reported in patients without adrenals.”
Katznelson also said that managing these patients can be challenging.
“Management of primary adrenal insufficiency is sometimes difficult, because not only does the patient lack cortisol, but will also lack aldosterone, which is important for maintaining electrolytes and volume status,” he said. “Patients often find it quite challenging to manage primary adrenal insufficiency.”
Medical therapies for Cushing’s syndrome
Besides surgery and radiation, endocrinologists can use several medical therapies to treat Cushing’s syndrome; however, to date, none has obtained FDA approval to treat the disorder.
The medical treatment used most often in the United States is ketoconazole, an antifungal agent that blocks the enzymes in the adrenal glands that produce steroids, Findling told Endocrine Today.
Ketoconazole, administered two to three times daily, is generally successful.
“It is an effective therapy,” Findling said. “Probably 50% to 70% of patients will have a response.”
However, this drug is not the optimal choice for long-term use.
“Ketoconazole has been associated with some toxicity; liver function abnormalities can occur and, in fact, liver failure can occur,” he said.
Another medical treatment option is mitotane (Lysodren, Bristol-Myers Squibb), which blocks adrenal steroid enzymes, Findling said. This toxic agent takes considerable time to work; in fact, it may require roughly 3 or 4 months for cortisol levels to normalize. It is used rarely in the United States.
“Mitotane has a limited future as a therapy for Cushing’s syndrome, except for in patients who have adrenal cancer, at least in the US,” Findling said.
Metyrapone (Metopirone, Novartis), another agent, effectively blocks adrenal steroid enzymes; however, it is not commercially available in the United States, Findling said.
Etomidate is an anesthetic agent that also inhibits adrenal steroidogenesis and is employed successfully in patients with very severe hypercortisolism who are not ready for surgery.
“If etomidate were available in a pill, it would be an excellent medical treatment for Cushing’s syndrome,” Findling said. “With subhypnotic doses, etomidate lowers the cortisol level smoothly down into the normal range. … It is well tolerated, but has to be given as a continuous IV infusion, so it is not practical.”
All of these medications have severe adverse effect profiles, according to Carmichael.
No replacement for surgery … yet
Although mifepristone and pasireotide show some promise as treatments for Cushing’s syndrome, it is not time to put the scalpels in storage, the experts said.
“Neither of these drugs, at least for the foreseeable future, will replace surgical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome,” Findling said. “Like most disorders, if you have a surgical procedure that will resolve the endocrinopathy and restore normal hormonal function, it is usually the treatment of choice.”
However, these medications are a welcome addition to the armamentarium, Carmichael said.
“It remains to be seen exactly what their place will be and how they will be best used. But, certainly, in cases where surgery is not an option or where you need to control the disease in someone who has very severe disease, they would have a role,” he said. Currently, Carmichael sees medical therapy as an adjuvant treatment, which would follow surgery if it was not curative. Also, endocrinologists may use them in place of surgery if surgery was not an option.
“There is a lot more room for work,” Carmichael said. “The ideal paradigm of having a medication that is safe and controls the disease and in a sense would replace surgery would be an ideal goal, but we are certainly not there yet.”– by Colleen Owens
For more information:
- Colao A. OR09-6. Presented at: The Endocrine Society 93rd Annual Meeting & Expo; June 4-7, 2011; Boston.
- Fleseriu M. [OR09-5] Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with refractory Cushing syndrome: results from the Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mifepristone in the Treatment of Endogenous Cushing Syndrome (SEISMIC). Presented at: The Endocrine Society 93rd Annual Meeting & Expo; June 4-7, 2011; Boston.
- Gross BA. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23:E10.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. NINDS Cushing’s syndrome information page. Available at: www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/cushings/cushings.htm.
- National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Information Service. Cushing’s syndrome. Available at: www.endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#causes.
Disclosures: Dr. Fleseriu is principal investigator in multiple Cushing’s trials and past consultant for Novartis; she is also the principal investigator on Corcept Cushing’s trials. Dr. Findling is a paid consultant for Corcept Therapeutics. The other doctors in this article did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
Which is the most reliable screening method for Cushing’s syndrome?
Tests are equally accurate, but have limitations
The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is problematic. It is one of the most difficult endocrine diseases to diagnose. Diagnosis includes assessing the symptoms and signs of Cushing’s syndrome because the symptoms and signs overlap with common disorders, including obesity, depression and polycystic ovary syndrome. Many patients consult websites in an attempt to find an explanation for their weight gain, fatigue, depression and other symptoms. They ask frequently after a Web search if their symptoms could be Cushing’s syndrome.
Screening tests for Cushing’s syndrome include three different tests: an 11 p.m. or midnight salivary cortisol level; a 24-hour urine free cortisol level; and an 8 a.m. cortisol level after ingestion of 1 mg of dexamethasone at midnight the previous night. How reliable are these tests? They are equally accurate — approximately 90% to 92% reliable, which is actually good for screening tests.
However, all three tests have limitations. Results of the nighttime salivary cortisol test are affected by laboratory accuracy (not all laboratories are equally reliable) and sleep patterns. In severe depression cases, the results may be falsely elevated. The 24-hour urine free cortisol test is an indicator of overall cortisol production. The most accurate method of measurement — tandem mass spectrometry with concomitant measurement of urine volume and urine creatinine — provides a good measure. It may take several 24-hour urine collections to confirm hypercortisolism. The 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test is reliable, but with several caveats. The test is standardized according to administering dexamethasone at midnight and measurement of serum cortisol promptly at 8 a.m. the following day. However, while the patient may have gone to the lab at 8 a.m., the blood sample may have been obtained later, which invalidates the test. Additionally, if the patient is taking medications that alter dexamethasone metabolism, the results may not be valid. The endocrinologist must measure a serum dexamethasone level to confirm the validity of the test.
The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is dependent upon confirming consistent overproduction of cortisol. The diagnosis may require repeated testing and this should be done in any patient in which there is a suspicion of Cushing’s syndrome.
Mary Lee Vance, MD, is professor of medicine and neurosurgery at University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va.
Disclosure: Dr. Vance reports no relevant financial disclosures.
Late-night salivary cortisol is best initial test
|
|
No test is perfect for all patients. In addition, it is important to remember that some patients will require multiple, different tests to confirm or exclude Cushing’s syndrome. However, that being said, late-night salivary cortisol is the best initial screening for most patients with suspected Cushing’s syndrome.
Late-night salivary cortisol is the most specific test for Cushing’s syndrome. The sensitivity and specificity are very good. Multiple studies have examined late night salivary cortisol testing, and the majority of those studies show sensitivity of more than 95% and a specificity in the range of 90% to 100%. That is comparable to — or better than — other methods to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome.
Also important to note: It is easy for patients to perform late-night salivary testing. Patients are able to do the collection at home and mail in the completed samples to a reference lab, whereas urinary free cortisol and dexamethasone suppression testing can be difficult for some patients to complete. In addition, for the most part, late-night salivary cortisol is not affected by other medications that patients take, unlike dexamethasone suppression testing, which can be affected by several medications that patients often take to treat other conditions.
Ty Carroll, MD, is assistant professor of medicine at Endocrinology Center and Clinics, Menomonee Falls, Wisc.
Disclosure: Dr. Carroll is an investigator in Corcept’s clinical trials of mifepristone.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Full Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma-emphasized on Surgical Skill of Otolaryngologist
Abstract
Keywords Nasal endoscopy – Pituitary adenoma – Complication – Surgical skill